Liz Sly on Aleppo

By far, the articles by Liz Sly are the most propagandistic about Syria among all Western correspondents reporting on Syria from Beirut--more than even Anne Barnard.  Look at this articles which is based on such high standards of documentation:  "activists said".  But what is funny is that she does not mention that the fighting began with a military campaign by the Syrian Islamist and FSA (as if the latter is secular) troops to capture the Aleppo prison area.  Her entire article assumes that there is only one side fighting.  Whenever her side does not do well, she presents the fighting as one between civilians and the regime when both sides (the Syrian regime troops and the armed rebel troops) are killing civilians daily.  And those activists who "say", are they all one voice? Do they have a media office? And do they all have one story to tell? And do they have one point of view?  Explain to us please.